Case Study Incompetent Cervix Surgery

1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Cervical insufficiency. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:1091–99.[PubMed]

2. Debbs RH, Chen J. Contemporary use of cerclage in pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2009;52(4):597–610.[PubMed]

3. Shirodkar VN. A new method of operative treatment for habitual abortion in the second trimester of pregnancy. Antiseptic. 1955;52:299.

4. McDonald IA. Suture of the cervix for inevitable miscarriage. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1957;64:346–50.[PubMed]

5. Seravalli V, Potti S, Berghella V. Risk of intrapartum cervical lacerations in women with cerclage. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26(3):294–98.[PubMed]

6. Alfirevic Z, Owen J, Carreras Moratonas E, et al. Vaginal progesterone, cerclage or cervical pessary for preventing preterm birth in asymptomatic singleton pregnant women with a history of preterm birth and a sonographic short cervix. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41(2):146–51.[PubMed]

7. Rand L, Norwitz ER. Current controversies in cervical cerclage. Semin Perinatol. 2003;27(1):73–85.[PubMed]

8. Matijevic R, Olujic B, Tumbri J, Kurjak A. Cervical incompetence: the use of selective and emergency cerclage. J Perinat Med. 2001;29:31–35.[PubMed]

9. Odibo AO, Berghella V, To MS, et al. Shirodkar versus McDonald cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth in women with short cervical length. Am J Perinatol. 2007;24(1):55–60.[PubMed]

10. Debby A, Sadan O, Glezerman M, Golan A. Favorable outcome following emergency second trimester cerclage. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007;96(1):16–19.[PubMed]

11. Celen S, Simsek Y, Ozyer S, et al. Effectiveness of emergency cervical cerclage in patients with cervical dilation in the second trimester. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38(2):131–33.[PubMed]

12. Gundabattula SR, Marakani LR, Dasari S, et al. Outcomes of pregnancy in women who had rescue cerclage for cervical insufficiency: a single-center retrospective study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2013;39(8):1293–300.[PubMed]

13. Cavus Y, Uysal A, Balsak D, et al. Emergency cervical cerclage: effect on pregnancy outcome and mode of delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27(1):80–83.[PubMed]

14. Keeler SM, Kiefer D, Rochon M, et al. A randomized trial of cerclage vs. 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate for treatment of short cervix. J Perinat Med. 2009;37(5):473–79.[PubMed]

15. Treadwell MC, Bronsteen RA, Bottoms SF. Prognostic factors and complication rates for cervical cerclage: a review of 482 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165(3):555–58.[PubMed]

16. Lisonkova S, Sabr Y, Joseph KS. Diagnosis of subclinical amniotic fluid infection prior to rescue cerclage using gram stain and glucose tests: an individual patient meta-analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014;36(2):116–22.[PubMed]

17. Chen C, Zhang QS. Advances in medical care for extremely low birth weight infants worldwide. Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics. 2013;15(8):703–7. [in Chinese] [PubMed]

18. Chen AC, Chung MY, Chang JH, Lin HC. Pathogenesis implication for necrotizing enterocolitis prevention in preterm very-low-birth-weight infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014;58(1):7–11.[PubMed]

19. Jiang ZD, Chen C. Impaired neural conduction in the auditory brainstem of high-risk very preterm infants. Clin Neurophysiol. 2014;125(6):1231–27.[PubMed]

20. Liu F, Zhao Q, Shao Y. Severe brain damage in premature infants associated with postnatal infection. Minerva Med. 2013;104(3):349–55.[PubMed]

21. Karau PB, Mutwiri MG, Ogeng’o JA, Karau GM. Use of cervical cerclage as a treatment option for cervical incompetence: patient characteristics, presentation and management over a 9 year period in a Kenyan centre. Afr J Reprod Health. 2013;17(1):169–73.[PubMed]

22. Gundabattula SR, Marakani LR, Dasari S, et al. Outcomes of pregnancy in women who had rescue cerclage for cervical insufficiency: a single-center retrospective study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2013;39(8):1293–300.[PubMed]

23. Güdücü N, Işçi H, Aydinli K. Results of midtrimester emergency cerclage. J Reprod Med. 2013;58(3–4):143–48.[PubMed]

24. Abu Hashim H, Al-Inany H, Kilani Z. A review of the contemporary evidence on rescue cervical cerclage. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;124(3):198–203.[PubMed]

25. Aoki S, Ohnuma E, Kurasawa K, et al. Emergency cerclage versus expectant management for prolapsed fetal membranes: a retrospective, comparative study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014;40(2):381–86.[PubMed]

26. Stupin JH, David M, Siedentopf JP, Dudenhausen JW. Emergency cerclage versus bed rest for amniotic sac prolapse before 27 gestational weeks. A retrospective, comparative study of 161 women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;139(1):32–37.[PubMed]

27. Abo-Yaqoub S, Mohammed AB, Saleh H. The effect of second trimester emergency cervical cerclage on perinatal outcome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(9):1746–49.[PubMed]

28. Althuisius SM, Dekker GA, Hummel P, van Geijn HP. Cervical incompetence prevention randomized cerclage trial. Cervical incompetence prevention randomized cerclage trial: emergency cerclage with bed rest versus bed rest alone. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(4):907–10.[PubMed]

29. Goodwin TM, Paul R, Silver H, et al. The effect of the oxytocin antagonist atosiban on preterm uterine activity in the human. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170:474–78.[PubMed]

30. Moutquin JM, Sherman D, Cohen H, et al. Double-blind, randomized, controlled trial of atosiban and ritodrine in the treatment of preterm labor: a multicenter effectiveness and safety study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182(5):1191–99.[PubMed]

31. Namouz S, Porat S, Okun N, et al. Emergency cerclage: literature review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2013;68(5):379–88.[PubMed]

32. Gupta M, Emary K, Impey L. Emergency cervical cerclage: predictors of success. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;23:670–74.[PubMed]

33. Fortner KB, Fitzpatrick CB, Grotegut CA, et al. Cervical dilation as a predictor of pregnancy outcome following emergency cerclage. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(10):1884–88.[PubMed]

34. Tezcan B, Hezelgrave N, Shennan A. The role of cervical ultrasound screening in determining the timing of emergency cerclage. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;32(5):444–46.[PubMed]

1. Crane JM. Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:1058–1062.[PubMed]

2. Kainz C, Gitsch G, Heinzl H, Breitenecker G. Incidence of cervical smears indicating dysplasia among Austrian women during the 1980s. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995;102:541–544.[PubMed]

3. Jolley JA, Wing DA. Pregnancy management after cervical surgery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2008;20:528–533.[PubMed]

4. Gentry DJ, Baggish MS, Brady K, Walsh PM, Hungler MS. The effects of loop excision of the transformation zone on cervical length: implications for pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182:516–520.[PubMed]

5. Prendiville W. Large loop excision of the transformation zone. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1995;38:622–639.[PubMed]

6. Arbyn M, Kyrgiou M, Simoens C, Raifu AO, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, et al. Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2008;337:a1284.[PMC free article][PubMed]

7. Kristensen J, Langhoff-Roos J, Kristensen FB. Increased risk of preterm birth in women with cervical conization. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;81:1005–1008.[PubMed]

8. Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, Arbyn M, Prendiville W, Paraskevaidis E. Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2006;367:489–498.[PubMed]

9. Leiman G, Harrison NA, Rubin A. Pregnancy following conization of the cervix: complications related to cone size. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980;136:14–18.[PubMed]

10. Luesley DM, McCrum A, Terry PB, Wade-Evans T, Nicholson HO, Mylotte MJ, et al. Complications of cone biopsy related to the dimensions of the cone and the influence of prior colposcopic assessment. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1985;92:158–164.[PubMed]

11. Moinian M, Andersch B. Does cervix conization increase the risk of complications in subsequent pregnancies? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1982;61:101–103.[PubMed]

12. Raio L, Ghezzi F, Di Naro E, Gomez R, Luscher KP. Duration of pregnancy after carbon dioxide laser conization of the cervix: influence of cone height. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90:978–982.[PubMed]

13. Jones JM, Sweetnam P, Hibbard BM. The outcome of pregnancy after cone biopsy of the cervix: a case-control study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1979;86:913–916.[PubMed]

14. Joseph KS, Kramer MS, Marcoux S, Ohlsson A, Wen SW, Allen A, et al. Determinants of preterm birth rates in Canada from 1981 through 1983 and from 1992 through 1994. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1434–1439.[PubMed]

15. Ricciotti HA, Burke L, Kobelin M, Slomovic B, Ludmir J. Ultrasound evaluation of cervical shortening after loop excision of the transformation zone (LETZ) Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1995;50:175–178.[PubMed]

16. Berghella V. Novel developments on cervical length screening and progesterone for preventing preterm birth. BJOG. 2009;116:182–187.[PubMed]

17. Berghella V, Talucci M, Desai A. Does transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length before 14 weeks predict preterm delivery in high-risk pregnancies? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21:140–144.[PubMed]

18. Owen J, Yost N, Berghella V, Thom E, Swain M, Dildy GA, 3rd, et al. Mid-trimester endovaginal sonography in women at high risk for spontaneous preterm birth. JAMA. 2001;286:1340–1348.[PubMed]

19. Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, Mercer BM, Moawad A, Das A, et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:567–572.[PubMed]

20. Kim YT. Current status of cervical cancer and HPV infection in Korea. J Gynecol Oncol. 2009;20:1–7.[PMC free article][PubMed]

21. Herbert A, Smith JA. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III (CIN III) and invasive cervical carcinoma: the yawning gap revisited and the treatment of risk. Cytopathology. 1999;10:161–170.[PubMed]

22. Acharya G, Kjeldberg I, Hansen SM, Sorheim N, Jacobsen BK, Maltau JM. Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure for the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2005;272:109–112.[PubMed]

23. Jakobsson M, Gissler M, Paavonen J, Tapper AM. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure and the risk for preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:504–510.[PubMed]

24. Jakobsson M, Gissler M, Sainio S, Paavonen J, Tapper AM. Preterm delivery after surgical treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:309–313.[PubMed]

25. Klaritsch P, Reich O, Giuliani A, Tamussino K, Haas J, Winter R. Delivery outcome after cold-knife conization of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;103:604–607.[PubMed]

26. Samson SL, Bentley JR, Fahey TJ, McKay DJ, Gill GH. The effect of loop electrosurgical excision procedure on future pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:325–332.[PubMed]

27. Althuisius SM, Schornagel IJ, Dekker GA, van Geijn HP, Hummel P. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure of the cervix and time of delivery in subsequent pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001;72:31–34.[PubMed]

28. Berghella V, Pereira L, Gariepy A, Simonazzi G. Prior cone biopsy: prediction of preterm birth by cervical ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:1393–1397.[PubMed]

29. Grimes-Dennis J, Berghella V. Cervical length and prediction of preterm delivery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;19:191–195.[PubMed]

30. Masamoto H, Nagai Y, Inamine M, Hirakawa M, Okubo E, Ishisoko A, et al. Outcome of pregnancy after laser conization: implications for infection as a causal link with preterm birth. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2008;34:838–842.[PubMed]

31. Ferenczy A, Choukroun D, Falcone T, Franco E. The effect of cervical loop electrosurgical excision on subsequent pregnancy outcome: North American experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;172:1246–1250.[PubMed]

32. Sadler L, Saftlas A. Cervical surgery and preterm birth. J Perinat Med. 2007;35:5–9.[PubMed]

33. Himes KP, Simhan HN. Time from cervical conization to pregnancy and preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:314–319.[PubMed]

34. Michelin MA, Merino LM, Franco CA, Murta EF. Pregnancy outcome after treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by the loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife conization. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2009;36:17–19.[PubMed]

35. Jackson GM, Ludmir J, Bader TJ. The accuracy of digital examination and ultrasound in the evaluation of cervical length. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;79:214–218.[PubMed]

36. Wright TC, Kurman RJ, Ferenczy A. Precancerous lesions of the cervix. In: Kurman RJ, editor. Blaustein's pathology of the female genital tract. 4th ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1994. p. 260.

37. Larsson G, Grundsell H, Gullberg B, Svennerud S. Outcome of pregnancy after conization. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1982;61:461–466.[PubMed]

38. Kullander S, Sjoberg NO. Treatment of carcinoma in situ of the cervix uteri by conization: a five-year follow-up. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1971;50:153–157.[PubMed]

39. Myllynen L, Karjalainen O. Pregnancy outcome after combined amputation and conization of the uterine cervix. Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1984;73:345–349.[PubMed]

40. Zeisler H, Joura EA, Bancher-Todesca D, Hanzal E, Gitsch G. Prophylactic cerclage in pregnancy: effect in women with a history of conization. J Reprod Med. 1997;42:390–392.[PubMed]

41. Robichaux AG, 3rd, Stedman CM, Hamer C. Uterine activity in patients with cervical cerclage. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;76(1 Suppl):63S–66S.[PubMed]

42. Charles D, Edwards WR. Infectious complications of cervical cerclage. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981;141:1065–1071.[PubMed]

43. Jewelewicz R. Incompetent cervix: pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment. Semin Perinatol. 1991;15:156–161.[PubMed]

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *